1. utnereader:

Like other bike-friendly cities, Minneapolis owes a lot to federal investment in cycling infrastructure. And that investment looks perilously insecure.  
Last month, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee voted to eliminate federal funding for bicycling projects and infrastructure. As PRI reports, last year, federal support amounted to $1.2 billion—less than 2 percent of all transportation spending—that went toward projects like the Safe Routes to School program as well as Complete Streets initiatives aimed at maintaining safe spaces for bikes and pedestrians on roadways. In the House Committee version, all of this would have been taken out. To the relief of many, a Senate version introduced early in March restored this funding, and it is likely to pass this week. The close call served as a reminder of how important federal dollars are in maintaining and expanding cycling options for city dwellers—and how much Washington’s spending priorities have recently shifted.
Keep reading …

unacceptable.
supporting infrastructure with tax dollars has far reaching benefits. 
spending tax dollars on things that go boom merely do that, boom.

    utnereader:

    Like other bike-friendly cities, Minneapolis owes a lot to federal investment in cycling infrastructure. And that investment looks perilously insecure.  

    Last month, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee voted to eliminate federal funding for bicycling projects and infrastructure. As PRI reports, last year, federal support amounted to $1.2 billion—less than 2 percent of all transportation spending—that went toward projects like the Safe Routes to School program as well as Complete Streets initiatives aimed at maintaining safe spaces for bikes and pedestrians on roadways. In the House Committee version, all of this would have been taken out. To the relief of many, a Senate version introduced early in March restored this funding, and it is likely to pass this week. The close call served as a reminder of how important federal dollars are in maintaining and expanding cycling options for city dwellers—and how much Washington’s spending priorities have recently shifted.

    Keep reading …

    unacceptable.

    supporting infrastructure with tax dollars has far reaching benefits. 

    spending tax dollars on things that go boom merely do that, boom.

    1. alleycatacres reblogged this from utnereader
    2. jahnnasbrain reblogged this from utnereader
    3. real-news reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
    4. reagan-was-a-horrible-president reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    5. and-the-devil-makes-three reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    6. braddogott reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    7. vicious8itches reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    8. hairtrending reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    9. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from utnereader
    10. shintanikun reblogged this from utnereader
    11. inscienceandcatgames reblogged this from utnereader and added:
      unacceptable. supporting infrastructure with tax...has far reaching benefits.
    12. theadamglass reblogged this from utnereader
    13. lettuceseewhathappens reblogged this from utnereader
    14. seewg reblogged this from utnereader and added:
      If only you knew how much cheaper bike infrastructure is, America. If only you knew….
    15. neighborhoodr-minneapolis reblogged this from utnereader
    16. live-life-to-the-fullestt reblogged this from utnereader
    17. idyllictorture reblogged this from utnereader
    18. zilfworks reblogged this from utnereader
    19. phroyd reblogged this from utnereader
    20. utnereader posted this